Emily Temple-Wood: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85.7%z 4.48 - 2
83.9%z 4.34 - 3
64.2%z 3.84 - 4
53.3%z 3.72 - 5
51.8%z 3.71 - 6
50%z 3.69 - 7
46.8%z 3.59 - 8
44.6%z 3.45 - 9
44.4%z 3.43 - 10
43.9%z 3.40 - 11
43.6%z 3.38 - 12
43.2%z 3.36 - 13
43%z 3.34 - 14
42.4%z 3.30 - 15
42.2%z 3.29 - 16
42.1%z 3.29 - 17
42%z 3.28 - 18
41.8%z 3.26 - 19
41.2%z 3.23 - 20
40.3%z 3.17 - 21
40.2%z 3.16 - 22
39.8%z 3.14 - 23
39.1%z 3.09 - 24
38.9%z 3.08 - 25
38.4%z 3.04 - 26
38.3%z 3.04 - 27
38.1%z 3.03 - 28
37.8%z 3.01 - 29
37.7%z 3.00 - 30
37.7%z 3.00 - 31
37.4%z 2.98 - 32
37.2%z 2.97 - 33
37.1%z 2.96 - 34
36.8%z 2.94 - 35
36.7%z 2.94 - 36
36.7%z 2.93 - 37
36.6%z 2.93 - 38
36.5%z 2.92 - 39
36.4%z 2.91 - 40
36.4%z 2.91 - 41
36.3%z 2.91 - 42
36.3%z 2.91 - 43
36%z 2.89 - 44
36%z 2.89 - 45
36%z 2.89 - 46
35.9%z 2.88 - 47
35.7%z 2.87 - 48
35.6%z 2.86 - 49
35.4%z 2.85 - 50
35.2%z 2.84