Ian Siegal: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.3%z 4.90 - 2
87.4%z 4.62 - 3
81.3%z 4.12 - 4
73.4%z 3.94 - 5
47.3%z 3.62 - 6
46.7%z 3.58 - 7
45.6%z 3.51 - 8
45.5%z 3.51 - 9
44.6%z 3.45 - 10
44.4%z 3.43 - 11
43.7%z 3.39 - 12
43.7%z 3.39 - 13
43.6%z 3.38 - 14
43.5%z 3.38 - 15
42.9%z 3.34 - 16
42.6%z 3.32 - 17
42.3%z 3.29 - 18
42.2%z 3.29 - 19
42.2%z 3.29 - 20
42.1%z 3.28 - 21
41.5%z 3.25 - 22
41.2%z 3.23 - 23
41.2%z 3.23 - 24
41.2%z 3.23 - 25
41.2%z 3.23 - 26
41.2%z 3.22 - 27
41.1%z 3.22 - 28
40.9%z 3.21 - 29
40.6%z 3.19 - 30
40.3%z 3.17 - 31
40.2%z 3.16 - 32
40.2%z 3.16 - 33
39.5%z 3.12 - 34
39%z 3.08 - 35
38.9%z 3.08 - 36
38.8%z 3.07 - 37
38.6%z 3.06 - 38
38.5%z 3.05 - 39
38.4%z 3.04 - 40
38.4%z 3.04 - 41
38.3%z 3.04 - 42
38.3%z 3.04 - 43
38.1%z 3.03 - 44
38%z 3.02 - 45
37.7%z 3.00 - 46
37.7%z 3.00 - 47
37.6%z 2.99 - 48
37.5%z 2.99 - 49
37.3%z 2.97 - 50
37.2%z 2.97