Thomas Bagger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.9%z 4.25 - 2
62.1%z 3.82 - 3
46.3%z 3.55 - 4
46.2%z 3.55 - 5
43.5%z 3.38 - 6
42.7%z 3.32 - 7
41.9%z 3.27 - 8
40.8%z 3.20 - 9
40.6%z 3.19 - 10
40.5%z 3.18 - 11
40.2%z 3.16 - 12
40.1%z 3.15 - 13
38.1%z 3.03 - 14
38%z 3.02 - 1537.7%z 3.00
- 16
37.5%z 2.99 - 17
37.5%z 2.98 - 18
37.3%z 2.97 - 19
37.1%z 2.96 - 20
37%z 2.95 - 21
36.8%z 2.94 - 22
36.5%z 2.92 - 2336.3%z 2.91
- 24
36.2%z 2.90 - 25
36.2%z 2.90 - 26
36.2%z 2.90 - 27
35.9%z 2.88 - 28
35.6%z 2.86 - 29
35.5%z 2.86 - 30
35.4%z 2.85 - 31
35.4%z 2.85 - 32
34.8%z 2.81 - 33
34.6%z 2.80 - 34
34.6%z 2.80 - 35
34.4%z 2.78 - 36
34.2%z 2.77 - 37
34.2%z 2.77 - 38
34.1%z 2.76 - 39
33.9%z 2.75 - 40
33.9%z 2.75 - 41
33.9%z 2.75 - 42
33.8%z 2.75 - 4333.6%z 2.74
- 44
33.6%z 2.73 - 45
33.4%z 2.72 - 46
33.3%z 2.71 - 47
33.2%z 2.71 - 48
33.2%z 2.70 - 49
33.1%z 2.70 - 50
32.9%z 2.69