Daniela Hunger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.5%z 4.79 - 2
52.9%z 3.72 - 3
47.3%z 3.62 - 4
45.7%z 3.52 - 5
45.5%z 3.51 - 6
44.7%z 3.46 - 7
44.7%z 3.45 - 8
44.3%z 3.43 - 9
44.3%z 3.42 - 10
44%z 3.41 - 11
44%z 3.41 - 12
44%z 3.40 - 13
43.4%z 3.37 - 14
43.2%z 3.36 - 15
43.1%z 3.35 - 16
42.9%z 3.33 - 17
42.6%z 3.32 - 18
42%z 3.28 - 19
41.3%z 3.23 - 20
41%z 3.21 - 21
40.9%z 3.20 - 22
40.7%z 3.20 - 23
40.5%z 3.18 - 24
40.4%z 3.18 - 25
40.2%z 3.16 - 26
39.9%z 3.14 - 27
39.7%z 3.13 - 28
39.6%z 3.12 - 29
39.6%z 3.12 - 30
39.5%z 3.12 - 31
39.4%z 3.11 - 32
39.3%z 3.10 - 33
39.2%z 3.10 - 34
39.2%z 3.09 - 35
39.1%z 3.09 - 36
39.1%z 3.09 - 37
38.9%z 3.08 - 38
38.8%z 3.07 - 39
38.7%z 3.06 - 40
38.4%z 3.04 - 41
38.4%z 3.04 - 42
38.4%z 3.04 - 43
38.3%z 3.04 - 44
38.3%z 3.04 - 45
38.3%z 3.04 - 46
37.9%z 3.01 - 47
37.7%z 3.00 - 48
37.7%z 3.00 - 49
37.6%z 2.99 - 50
37.6%z 2.99