Christina Lamb: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.3%z 5.07 - 2
82.7%z 4.24 - 3
80.4%z 4.05 - 4
80%z 4.02 - 5
74.6%z 3.96 - 6
74.5%z 3.96 - 7
68.7%z 3.89 - 8
57.5%z 3.77 - 9
49.3%z 3.68 - 10
47.2%z 3.61 - 11
46.9%z 3.59 - 12
46.6%z 3.57 - 13
46.2%z 3.55 - 14
46.1%z 3.54 - 15
45.6%z 3.51 - 16
45.4%z 3.50 - 17
43.9%z 3.40 - 18
43.9%z 3.40 - 19
43.8%z 3.39 - 20
43.7%z 3.39 - 21
42.9%z 3.34 - 22
42.5%z 3.31 - 23
42.3%z 3.30 - 24
42.2%z 3.29 - 25
42%z 3.28 - 26
42%z 3.28 - 27
41.9%z 3.27 - 28
41.9%z 3.27 - 29
41.8%z 3.27 - 30
41.5%z 3.24 - 31
41.4%z 3.24 - 32
41.2%z 3.23 - 33
41%z 3.21 - 34
40.9%z 3.21 - 35
40.9%z 3.21 - 36
40.8%z 3.20 - 37
40.7%z 3.20 - 38
40.6%z 3.18 - 39
40.4%z 3.17 - 40
40.4%z 3.17 - 41
40.3%z 3.17 - 42
40.3%z 3.17 - 43
40.2%z 3.16 - 44
40.2%z 3.16 - 45
39.6%z 3.12 - 46
39.3%z 3.10 - 47
39.3%z 3.10 - 48
39.2%z 3.09 - 49
39.1%z 3.09 - 50
39%z 3.08