David L. Paterson: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
92.9%z 5.38 - 2
88.8%z 4.74 - 3
81.9%z 4.17 - 4
81.4%z 4.13 - 5
74.8%z 3.96 - 6
47.2%z 3.61 - 7
46.5%z 3.57 - 8
45.6%z 3.51 - 9
45%z 3.47 - 10
44.9%z 3.47 - 11
44.9%z 3.46 - 12
44.7%z 3.45 - 13
43.9%z 3.40 - 14
43.4%z 3.37 - 15
42.4%z 3.31 - 16
42.3%z 3.30 - 17
42.3%z 3.29 - 18
42.3%z 3.29 - 19
41.7%z 3.26 - 20
41.4%z 3.24 - 21
40.6%z 3.19 - 22
40.2%z 3.16 - 23
39.8%z 3.13 - 24
39.5%z 3.12 - 25
39.5%z 3.11 - 26
39.4%z 3.11 - 27
39.4%z 3.11 - 28
39.2%z 3.09 - 29
39.1%z 3.09 - 30
38.9%z 3.07 - 31
38.9%z 3.07 - 32
38.6%z 3.06 - 33
38.4%z 3.04 - 34
38.3%z 3.04 - 35
38.1%z 3.03 - 36
38.1%z 3.02 - 37
37.8%z 3.01 - 38
37.7%z 3.00 - 39
37.6%z 3.00 - 40
37.4%z 2.98 - 41
37.2%z 2.97 - 42
37.2%z 2.97 - 43
37.2%z 2.97 - 44
37.2%z 2.96 - 45
36.9%z 2.95 - 46
36.8%z 2.94 - 47
36.6%z 2.93 - 48
36.5%z 2.92 - 49
36.3%z 2.91 - 50
36.3%z 2.91