Thomas Luther: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
71.9%z 3.93 - 2
47.9%z 3.66 - 3
46.4%z 3.56 - 4
45.8%z 3.53 - 5
44.2%z 3.42 - 6
44%z 3.41 - 7
43.6%z 3.38 - 8
43.6%z 3.38 - 9
43.2%z 3.35 - 10
43.2%z 3.35 - 11
43%z 3.34 - 12
42.9%z 3.34 - 13
42.7%z 3.33 - 14
42.5%z 3.31 - 15
42.5%z 3.31 - 16
42.3%z 3.30 - 17
42.1%z 3.28 - 18
41.7%z 3.26 - 19
41.4%z 3.24 - 20
41.2%z 3.23 - 21
41.1%z 3.22 - 22
40.8%z 3.20 - 23
39.9%z 3.14 - 24
39.9%z 3.14 - 25
39.7%z 3.13 - 26
39.7%z 3.13 - 27
39.6%z 3.12 - 28
39.5%z 3.12 - 29
39.5%z 3.12 - 30
39.3%z 3.10 - 31
39.2%z 3.10 - 32
39.2%z 3.10 - 33
39.2%z 3.10 - 34
39.2%z 3.09 - 35
39%z 3.08 - 36
38.9%z 3.07 - 37
37.8%z 3.00 - 38
37.7%z 3.00 - 39
37.5%z 2.98 - 40
37.2%z 2.97 - 41
37%z 2.95 - 42
36.6%z 2.93 - 43
36.5%z 2.92 - 44
36.3%z 2.91 - 45
36.3%z 2.91 - 46
36.2%z 2.90 - 47
36.1%z 2.89 - 48
36%z 2.89 - 49
36%z 2.89 - 50
35.6%z 2.86