Thomas Strobl: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.5%z 4.38 - 2
83.1%z 4.27 - 3
71.8%z 3.93 - 4
67.8%z 3.88 - 5
67.3%z 3.88 - 6
66.1%z 3.86 - 7
62.9%z 3.83 - 8
62.6%z 3.83 - 9
58.3%z 3.78 - 10
57.3%z 3.77 - 11
52.3%z 3.71 - 12
49.2%z 3.68 - 13
48.9%z 3.68 - 14
48.1%z 3.67 - 15
47.9%z 3.66 - 16
47.5%z 3.63 - 17
45.5%z 3.51 - 18
45.3%z 3.49 - 19
45.2%z 3.48 - 20
45%z 3.47 - 21
44.8%z 3.46 - 22
44.7%z 3.45 - 23
43.5%z 3.37 - 24
43.4%z 3.37 - 25
43.3%z 3.36 - 26
43.3%z 3.36 - 27
43.2%z 3.36 - 28
43.2%z 3.36 - 29
43.1%z 3.35 - 30
42.9%z 3.34 - 31
42.8%z 3.33 - 32
42.7%z 3.32 - 33
42.6%z 3.32 - 34
42.6%z 3.32 - 35
42.6%z 3.32 - 36
42.4%z 3.30 - 37
42.3%z 3.29 - 38
41.9%z 3.27 - 39
41.9%z 3.27 - 40
41.7%z 3.26 - 41
41.4%z 3.24 - 42
41.4%z 3.24 - 43
41.3%z 3.23 - 44
41.2%z 3.22 - 45
41%z 3.22 - 46
40.7%z 3.19 - 47
40.7%z 3.19 - 48
40.5%z 3.18 - 49
40.1%z 3.16 - 50
39.9%z 3.14