William Kircher: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
67.9%z 3.88 - 2
64.2%z 3.84 - 3
51.8%z 3.71 - 4
49.3%z 3.68 - 5
47.9%z 3.66 - 6
47.3%z 3.62 - 7
46.6%z 3.57 - 8
45.8%z 3.53 - 9
45.6%z 3.51 - 10
44.9%z 3.47 - 11
43.8%z 3.40 - 12
43.8%z 3.39 - 13
43.6%z 3.38 - 14
43.4%z 3.37 - 15
43.2%z 3.35 - 16
43%z 3.34 - 17
42.1%z 3.28 - 18
41.3%z 3.23 - 19
40.9%z 3.21 - 20
40.9%z 3.20 - 21
40.7%z 3.19 - 22
39.9%z 3.14 - 23
39.4%z 3.11 - 24
39.1%z 3.09 - 25
39%z 3.08 - 26
39%z 3.08 - 27
38.6%z 3.06 - 28
38.6%z 3.06 - 29
38.6%z 3.05 - 30
38.5%z 3.05 - 31
38.3%z 3.04 - 32
37.6%z 2.99 - 33
37.4%z 2.98 - 34
37.4%z 2.98 - 35
37.3%z 2.98 - 36
37.2%z 2.97 - 37
37.2%z 2.96 - 38
37.1%z 2.96 - 39
37%z 2.95 - 40
36.9%z 2.95 - 41
36.6%z 2.93 - 42
36.6%z 2.93 - 43
36.1%z 2.90 - 44
36.1%z 2.89 - 45
36%z 2.89 - 46
36%z 2.89 - 47
36%z 2.89 - 48
35.9%z 2.88 - 49
35.8%z 2.87 - 50
35.5%z 2.86