Achim Tang: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84%z 4.35 - 2
79.6%z 4.01 - 3
65.7%z 3.86 - 4
64%z 3.84 - 5
57.1%z 3.77 - 6
52.1%z 3.71 - 7
51%z 3.70 - 8
47.2%z 3.61 - 9
47.1%z 3.61 - 10
46.6%z 3.58 - 11
46.2%z 3.55 - 12
45.7%z 3.52 - 13
45%z 3.47 - 14
44.1%z 3.41 - 15
44%z 3.41 - 16
43.5%z 3.37 - 17
41.4%z 3.24 - 18
41%z 3.21 - 19
40.9%z 3.21 - 20
40.6%z 3.19 - 21
40.6%z 3.19 - 22
40.3%z 3.17 - 23
40.1%z 3.16 - 24
39.7%z 3.13 - 25
39.6%z 3.12 - 26
39.5%z 3.11 - 27
39.4%z 3.11 - 28
39.4%z 3.11 - 29
39.3%z 3.11 - 30
38.9%z 3.08 - 31
38.7%z 3.07 - 32
38.6%z 3.06 - 33
38.6%z 3.06 - 34
38.3%z 3.04 - 35
38.3%z 3.04 - 36
38.1%z 3.03 - 37
37.5%z 2.99 - 38
37.4%z 2.98 - 39
37.3%z 2.97 - 40
37.3%z 2.97 - 41
37.2%z 2.96 - 42
36.7%z 2.93 - 43
36.6%z 2.93 - 44
36.6%z 2.93 - 45
36.6%z 2.93 - 46
36.6%z 2.93 - 47
36.4%z 2.91 - 48
36%z 2.89 - 49
35.9%z 2.88 - 50
35.8%z 2.87