David Romer: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.2%z 4.87 - 2
51.6%z 3.71 - 3
50.1%z 3.69 - 4
48.8%z 3.67 - 5
48.4%z 3.67 - 6
47.4%z 3.63 - 7
46.4%z 3.56 - 8
45.8%z 3.52 - 9
44.7%z 3.45 - 10
42.8%z 3.33 - 11
42.6%z 3.32 - 12
42.5%z 3.31 - 13
42.4%z 3.30 - 14
42.3%z 3.30 - 15
42.2%z 3.29 - 16
42.1%z 3.28 - 17
42%z 3.28 - 18
41.6%z 3.25 - 19
41.5%z 3.25 - 20
41.4%z 3.24 - 21
41.1%z 3.22 - 22
40.9%z 3.21 - 23
40.9%z 3.20 - 24
40.6%z 3.19 - 25
40.5%z 3.18 - 26
40.4%z 3.17 - 27
40.4%z 3.17 - 28
40.3%z 3.17 - 29
39.9%z 3.14 - 30
39.7%z 3.13 - 31
39.6%z 3.13 - 32
39%z 3.09 - 33
38.8%z 3.07 - 34
38.6%z 3.06 - 35
38.6%z 3.06 - 36
38.5%z 3.05 - 37
38.4%z 3.04 - 38
38.4%z 3.04 - 39
38%z 3.02 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.7%z 3.00 - 42
37.7%z 3.00 - 43
37.6%z 2.99 - 44
37.4%z 2.98 - 45
37.3%z 2.98 - 46
37.3%z 2.97 - 47
37.1%z 2.96 - 48
36.9%z 2.95 - 49
36.9%z 2.95 - 50
36.9%z 2.94