Herbert Beerbohm Tree: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
94.5%z 5.67 - 2
86.9%z 4.58 - 3
86.2%z 4.52 - 4
86%z 4.51 - 5
84.4%z 4.38 - 6
83.2%z 4.27 - 7
81.4%z 4.13 - 8
63%z 3.83 - 9
55%z 3.74 - 10
54.9%z 3.74 - 11
52.6%z 3.72 - 12
46.8%z 3.59 - 13
46.6%z 3.58 - 14
46.5%z 3.57 - 15
45.9%z 3.53 - 16
44.3%z 3.43 - 17
43.6%z 3.38 - 18
43.5%z 3.37 - 19
43.3%z 3.36 - 20
43.2%z 3.36 - 21
42.9%z 3.33 - 22
42.8%z 3.33 - 23
42.8%z 3.33 - 24
42.6%z 3.32 - 25
41.9%z 3.27 - 26
41.9%z 3.27 - 27
41.8%z 3.26 - 28
41.1%z 3.22 - 29
41%z 3.22 - 30
40.9%z 3.21 - 31
40.9%z 3.20 - 32
40.7%z 3.20 - 33
40.6%z 3.19 - 34
40.3%z 3.17 - 35
40.2%z 3.16 - 36
40.2%z 3.16 - 37
40.2%z 3.16 - 38
40.1%z 3.16 - 39
39.8%z 3.14 - 40
39.6%z 3.12 - 41
39.6%z 3.12 - 42
39.5%z 3.12 - 4339.4%z 3.11
- 44
39.4%z 3.11 - 45
39.4%z 3.11 - 46
39.1%z 3.09 - 47
38.9%z 3.08 - 48
38.7%z 3.06 - 49
38.7%z 3.06 - 50
38.5%z 3.05