Stuart Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.4%z 4.62 - 2
80.6%z 4.07 - 3
60.9%z 3.81 - 4
51.1%z 3.70 - 5
50%z 3.69 - 6
47%z 3.60 - 7
46.7%z 3.59 - 8
46%z 3.54 - 9
45.7%z 3.52 - 10
44.3%z 3.43 - 11
43.9%z 3.40 - 12
43.9%z 3.40 - 13
43.7%z 3.39 - 14
42.9%z 3.34 - 15
42.7%z 3.33 - 16
42.4%z 3.30 - 17
42.2%z 3.29 - 18
42.1%z 3.28 - 19
41.8%z 3.26 - 20
41.1%z 3.22 - 21
41.1%z 3.22 - 22
40.8%z 3.20 - 23
40.7%z 3.19 - 24
40.6%z 3.19 - 25
40.5%z 3.18 - 26
40.4%z 3.17 - 27
40.4%z 3.17 - 28
40%z 3.15 - 29
40%z 3.15 - 30
39.9%z 3.14 - 31
39.6%z 3.12 - 32
39.5%z 3.11 - 33
39.2%z 3.10 - 34
39.2%z 3.09 - 35
39.1%z 3.09 - 36
39%z 3.08 - 37
38.7%z 3.06 - 38
38.7%z 3.06 - 39
38.5%z 3.05 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.6%z 2.99 - 42
37.6%z 2.99 - 43
37.5%z 2.99 - 44
37.5%z 2.99 - 45
37.5%z 2.98 - 46
37.4%z 2.98 - 47
37.3%z 2.97 - 48
37.3%z 2.97 - 49
37.2%z 2.97 - 50
37.2%z 2.97