Giman Kim: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.7%z 4.96 - 2
88.5%z 4.71 - 3
85.9%z 4.50 - 4
85.2%z 4.44 - 5
83.7%z 4.32 - 6
81.2%z 4.12 - 7
73.1%z 3.94 - 8
69.4%z 3.90 - 9
63.3%z 3.83 - 10
61.9%z 3.82 - 11
59.7%z 3.79 - 12
58.5%z 3.78 - 13
52.6%z 3.72 - 14
52.2%z 3.71 - 15
51%z 3.70 - 16
47.9%z 3.66 - 17
47.6%z 3.64 - 18
47.3%z 3.62 - 19
47.2%z 3.61 - 20
46.9%z 3.60 - 21
46.3%z 3.56 - 22
45.9%z 3.53 - 23
45.8%z 3.53 - 24
45.6%z 3.51 - 25
45.5%z 3.50 - 26
44.9%z 3.46 - 27
44.7%z 3.45 - 28
44.6%z 3.44 - 29
44.5%z 3.44 - 30
44.4%z 3.44 - 31
44.4%z 3.44 - 32
44.4%z 3.43 - 33
44.2%z 3.42 - 34
44.1%z 3.41 - 35
43.7%z 3.39 - 36
43.5%z 3.37 - 37
43.4%z 3.37 - 38
43%z 3.34 - 39
43%z 3.34 - 40
42.9%z 3.33 - 41
42.6%z 3.32 - 42
42.6%z 3.32 - 43
42.6%z 3.32 - 44
42.6%z 3.32 - 45
42.5%z 3.31 - 46
42.4%z 3.30 - 47
42.2%z 3.29 - 48
42.1%z 3.29 - 49
42.1%z 3.28 - 50
41.6%z 3.25