Lee Charm: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.1%z 4.11 - 2
80.9%z 4.09 - 3
73.2%z 3.94 - 4
65.4%z 3.86 - 5
58.3%z 3.78 - 6
51.1%z 3.70 - 7
49.5%z 3.68 - 8
47.4%z 3.63 - 9
47.3%z 3.62 - 10
47%z 3.60 - 11
46.8%z 3.59 - 12
46.8%z 3.59 - 13
46.2%z 3.55 - 14
43.4%z 3.37 - 15
43.1%z 3.35 - 16
43%z 3.34 - 17
43%z 3.34 - 18
42.9%z 3.34 - 19
42.8%z 3.33 - 20
42.7%z 3.33 - 21
42.7%z 3.32 - 22
42.5%z 3.31 - 23
42.4%z 3.31 - 24
41.4%z 3.24 - 25
41.4%z 3.24 - 26
41.2%z 3.23 - 27
41.1%z 3.22 - 28
40.8%z 3.20 - 29
40.8%z 3.20 - 30
40.8%z 3.20 - 31
40.7%z 3.19 - 32
40.3%z 3.17 - 33
40.3%z 3.17 - 34
40.3%z 3.16 - 35
40.2%z 3.16 - 36
40.1%z 3.15 - 37
39.8%z 3.14 - 38
39.5%z 3.12 - 39
39.1%z 3.09 - 40
38.9%z 3.08 - 41
38.8%z 3.07 - 42
38.7%z 3.06 - 43
38.6%z 3.06 - 44
38.1%z 3.03 - 45
37.8%z 3.01 - 46
37.7%z 3.00 - 47
37.5%z 2.98 - 48
36.9%z 2.95 - 49
36.9%z 2.95 - 50
36.6%z 2.93