Thomas Kristl: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
68.4%z 3.89 - 2
54.7%z 3.74 - 3
47.3%z 3.62 - 4
46.6%z 3.58 - 5
45.3%z 3.49 - 6
45.3%z 3.49 - 7
42.9%z 3.34 - 8
42.6%z 3.31 - 9
42%z 3.28 - 10
41.1%z 3.22 - 11
41.1%z 3.22 - 12
40.1%z 3.15 - 13
39.8%z 3.13 - 14
39.3%z 3.10 - 15
39.2%z 3.10 - 16
39.1%z 3.09 - 17
38.7%z 3.07 - 18
38.6%z 3.06 - 19
38.5%z 3.05 - 20
38.5%z 3.05 - 21
38.1%z 3.02 - 22
38%z 3.02 - 23
38%z 3.02 - 24
37.7%z 3.00 - 25
37.6%z 2.99 - 26
37.5%z 2.99 - 27
37.3%z 2.97 - 28
37.1%z 2.96 - 29
36.7%z 2.94 - 30
36.7%z 2.93 - 31
36.5%z 2.92 - 32
36.2%z 2.90 - 33
36.1%z 2.90 - 34
36%z 2.89 - 35
36%z 2.89 - 36
35.7%z 2.87 - 37
35.5%z 2.86 - 38
35.4%z 2.85 - 39
35.3%z 2.85 - 40
35.1%z 2.83 - 41
35.1%z 2.83 - 42
35%z 2.82 - 43
34.9%z 2.82 - 44
34.8%z 2.81 - 45
34.8%z 2.81 - 46
34.7%z 2.81 - 47
34.7%z 2.81 - 48
34.6%z 2.80 - 49
34.4%z 2.78 - 50
34.3%z 2.78