David Amess: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.9%z 4.17 - 2
56.5%z 3.76 - 3
52.8%z 3.72 - 4
47.3%z 3.62 - 5
47.1%z 3.61 - 6
47.1%z 3.61 - 7
47.1%z 3.61 - 8
46.8%z 3.59 - 9
46.7%z 3.58 - 10
46.4%z 3.56 - 11
45.7%z 3.52 - 12
45.2%z 3.48 - 13
44.1%z 3.42 - 14
43.5%z 3.38 - 15
42.9%z 3.33 - 16
42.7%z 3.33 - 17
42.5%z 3.31 - 18
42.3%z 3.30 - 19
42.3%z 3.30 - 20
41.9%z 3.27 - 21
41.8%z 3.27 - 22
41.7%z 3.26 - 23
41.4%z 3.24 - 24
41.4%z 3.24 - 25
40.7%z 3.19 - 26
40.4%z 3.18 - 27
40.3%z 3.17 - 28
40.3%z 3.17 - 29
40.2%z 3.16 - 30
39.9%z 3.14 - 31
39.9%z 3.14 - 32
39.7%z 3.13 - 33
39.7%z 3.13 - 34
39.6%z 3.12 - 35
39.2%z 3.10 - 36
38.7%z 3.07 - 37
38.6%z 3.06 - 38
38.6%z 3.05 - 39
38.4%z 3.04 - 40
38.2%z 3.03 - 41
38.2%z 3.03 - 42
37.9%z 3.01 - 43
37.6%z 2.99 - 44
37.5%z 2.99 - 45
37.4%z 2.98 - 46
37.3%z 2.97 - 47
37.2%z 2.97 - 48
36.9%z 2.95 - 49
36.9%z 2.95 - 50
36.9%z 2.95