James Comer: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83%z 4.26 - 2
82.8%z 4.24 - 3
73.6%z 3.95 - 4
63.9%z 3.84 - 5
63%z 3.83 - 6
63%z 3.83 - 7
47.7%z 3.65 - 8
47.7%z 3.65 - 9
46.8%z 3.59 - 10
45%z 3.47 - 11
44.3%z 3.43 - 12
44.2%z 3.42 - 13
43.6%z 3.38 - 14
43.1%z 3.35 - 15
42.5%z 3.31 - 16
42.1%z 3.29 - 17
42.1%z 3.29 - 18
41.2%z 3.23 - 19
41%z 3.21 - 20
41%z 3.21 - 21
40.9%z 3.21 - 22
40.7%z 3.19 - 23
40.7%z 3.19 - 24
40.7%z 3.19 - 25
40.7%z 3.19 - 26
40.6%z 3.19 - 27
40.5%z 3.18 - 28
40.4%z 3.17 - 29
40.3%z 3.17 - 30
40.3%z 3.17 - 31
40.1%z 3.15 - 32
39.8%z 3.13 - 33
38.6%z 3.06 - 34
38.5%z 3.05 - 35
38.4%z 3.05 - 36
38.4%z 3.04 - 37
38.2%z 3.03 - 38
38%z 3.02 - 39
37.9%z 3.01 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.6%z 2.99 - 42
37.5%z 2.99 - 43
37.3%z 2.97 - 44
37.2%z 2.96 - 45
37.1%z 2.96 - 46
37%z 2.96 - 47
37%z 2.95 - 48
36.9%z 2.95 - 49
36.7%z 2.93