Jim Riggleman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.7%z 4.32 - 2
81.6%z 4.15 - 3
73.8%z 3.95 - 4
71.5%z 3.92 - 5
65.6%z 3.86 - 6
47.3%z 3.62 - 7
46.2%z 3.55 - 8
45.6%z 3.51 - 9
45.2%z 3.49 - 10
44.6%z 3.45 - 11
44%z 3.41 - 12
43.9%z 3.40 - 13
42.9%z 3.34 - 14
42.3%z 3.30 - 15
41.8%z 3.26 - 16
41.6%z 3.25 - 17
41.6%z 3.25 - 18
41.5%z 3.25 - 19
41.3%z 3.23 - 20
40.8%z 3.20 - 21
40.8%z 3.20 - 22
40.7%z 3.19 - 23
40.5%z 3.18 - 24
40.4%z 3.18 - 25
40%z 3.15 - 26
40%z 3.15 - 27
40%z 3.15 - 28
39.9%z 3.14 - 29
39.8%z 3.14 - 30
39.4%z 3.11 - 31
39.3%z 3.10 - 32
39.2%z 3.10 - 33
39%z 3.08 - 34
38.9%z 3.07 - 35
38.8%z 3.07 - 36
38.6%z 3.06 - 37
38.5%z 3.05 - 38
38.4%z 3.05 - 39
38.4%z 3.04 - 40
38.3%z 3.04 - 41
37.9%z 3.01 - 42
37.8%z 3.01 - 43
37.8%z 3.00 - 44
37.7%z 3.00 - 45
37.7%z 3.00 - 46
37.5%z 2.99 - 47
37.3%z 2.98 - 48
37.2%z 2.97 - 49
37.2%z 2.97 - 50
37.2%z 2.97