Luke Chambers: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
66.6%z 3.87 - 2
54.1%z 3.73 - 3
49.1%z 3.68 - 4
47%z 3.60 - 5
46.4%z 3.56 - 645%z 3.47
- 7
44.4%z 3.43 - 8
44.4%z 3.43 - 9
43.4%z 3.37 - 10
42.5%z 3.31 - 11
42.5%z 3.31 - 12
41.3%z 3.23 - 13
41%z 3.21 - 14
39.7%z 3.13 - 15
39.6%z 3.12 - 16
39.6%z 3.12 - 17
39.6%z 3.12 - 18
39.4%z 3.11 - 19
38.9%z 3.07 - 2038.7%z 3.06
- 21
38.5%z 3.05 - 22
38.3%z 3.04 - 23
38.2%z 3.03 - 24
37.8%z 3.01 - 25
37.7%z 3.00 - 26
37.7%z 3.00 - 27
37.2%z 2.97 - 28
37.2%z 2.96 - 29
36.3%z 2.91 - 30
36.2%z 2.90 - 31
35.8%z 2.88 - 32
35.1%z 2.83 - 3335%z 2.83
- 34
34.8%z 2.81 - 35
34.6%z 2.80 - 36
34.5%z 2.79 - 37
34.5%z 2.79 - 38
34.5%z 2.79 - 39
34.5%z 2.79 - 40
34.5%z 2.79 - 41
34.2%z 2.77 - 42
34.1%z 2.77 - 43
34%z 2.76 - 44
34%z 2.76 - 45
33.8%z 2.75 - 46
33.7%z 2.74 - 47
33.6%z 2.73 - 48
33.3%z 2.72 - 49
33.3%z 2.72 - 50
33.3%z 2.71