Thomas Kirch: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.1%z 5.03 - 2
83.6%z 4.31 - 3
82.3%z 4.20 - 4
80.8%z 4.08 - 5
67%z 3.87 - 6
51.4%z 3.70 - 7
47.1%z 3.61 - 8
46.4%z 3.56 - 9
45.8%z 3.52 - 10
45.4%z 3.50 - 11
44.4%z 3.43 - 12
44.4%z 3.43 - 13
42.3%z 3.30 - 14
40.5%z 3.18 - 15
39.1%z 3.09 - 16
39%z 3.08 - 17
38.9%z 3.08 - 18
38.8%z 3.07 - 19
38.5%z 3.05 - 20
38.1%z 3.02 - 21
38%z 3.02 - 22
37.8%z 3.01 - 23
37.7%z 3.00 - 24
37.6%z 3.00 - 25
37.6%z 2.99 - 26
37.5%z 2.99 - 27
37.5%z 2.99 - 28
37.1%z 2.96 - 29
36.7%z 2.94 - 30
36.4%z 2.92 - 31
36.1%z 2.90 - 32
35.5%z 2.86 - 33
35.4%z 2.85 - 34
35.4%z 2.85 - 35
35.4%z 2.85 - 36
35.3%z 2.84 - 37
35.3%z 2.84 - 38
35.2%z 2.84 - 39
35%z 2.82 - 40
34.9%z 2.82 - 41
34.5%z 2.79 - 42
34.4%z 2.79 - 43
34.3%z 2.78 - 44
34.2%z 2.78 - 45
34.2%z 2.77 - 46
34.2%z 2.77 - 47
34.1%z 2.77 - 48
34.1%z 2.76 - 49
34.1%z 2.76 - 50
34.1%z 2.76