Thomas Ebermann: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
70%z 3.91 - 2
57%z 3.76 - 3
54.4%z 3.74 - 4
50.5%z 3.69 - 5
49.8%z 3.69 - 6
47.3%z 3.62 - 7
46.8%z 3.59 - 8
46.7%z 3.58 - 9
46.6%z 3.57 - 10
46.4%z 3.56 - 11
45.5%z 3.51 - 12
45.4%z 3.50 - 13
45.1%z 3.48 - 14
44.7%z 3.45 - 15
43.1%z 3.35 - 16
42.9%z 3.34 - 17
42.8%z 3.33 - 18
42.3%z 3.30 - 19
40.7%z 3.19 - 20
40.4%z 3.18 - 21
40.2%z 3.16 - 22
39.1%z 3.09 - 23
39.1%z 3.09 - 24
38.9%z 3.08 - 25
38.6%z 3.06 - 26
38.4%z 3.04 - 27
38.2%z 3.03 - 28
38.1%z 3.03 - 29
38.1%z 3.03 - 30
38%z 3.02 - 31
37.9%z 3.01 - 32
37.8%z 3.01 - 33
37.7%z 3.00 - 34
37.6%z 3.00 - 35
37.6%z 2.99 - 36
37.5%z 2.98 - 37
37.4%z 2.98 - 38
37.2%z 2.97 - 39
37.1%z 2.96 - 40
37.1%z 2.96 - 41
36.6%z 2.93 - 42
36.3%z 2.91 - 43
36%z 2.89 - 44
35.9%z 2.88 - 45
35.9%z 2.88 - 46
35.8%z 2.87 - 47
35.7%z 2.87 - 48
35.7%z 2.87 - 49
35.6%z 2.87 - 50
35.6%z 2.86