Tim Dieck: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.2%z 4.11 - 2
57.4%z 3.77 - 3
51.4%z 3.70 - 4
47.1%z 3.61 - 5
47%z 3.60 - 6
46.3%z 3.55 - 7
45.5%z 3.51 - 8
45.4%z 3.50 - 9
45.2%z 3.49 - 10
45.2%z 3.48 - 11
44.4%z 3.43 - 12
44.3%z 3.43 - 13
44.1%z 3.41 - 14
44.1%z 3.41 - 15
44%z 3.40 - 16
43.2%z 3.35 - 17
42.8%z 3.33 - 18
42.4%z 3.30 - 19
42.3%z 3.30 - 20
41.8%z 3.27 - 21
41.5%z 3.24 - 22
41%z 3.21 - 23
41%z 3.21 - 24
40.3%z 3.17 - 25
40.1%z 3.16 - 26
39.9%z 3.14 - 27
39%z 3.09 - 28
38.8%z 3.07 - 29
38.8%z 3.07 - 30
38.8%z 3.07 - 31
38.6%z 3.06 - 32
38.4%z 3.05 - 33
38.3%z 3.04 - 34
38%z 3.02 - 35
37.9%z 3.01 - 36
37.7%z 3.00 - 37
37.4%z 2.98 - 38
37.2%z 2.97 - 39
37.1%z 2.96 - 40
37%z 2.96 - 41
37%z 2.95 - 42
36.6%z 2.93 - 43
36.6%z 2.92 - 44
36.4%z 2.91 - 45
36.2%z 2.90 - 46
36%z 2.89 - 47
35.7%z 2.87 - 48
35.6%z 2.86 - 49
35.5%z 2.86 - 50
35.4%z 2.85