Tim Flowers: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
78%z 3.99 - 2
64.8%z 3.85 - 3
58.2%z 3.78 - 4
57.2%z 3.77 - 5
47.2%z 3.61 - 6
46.9%z 3.60 - 7
46.6%z 3.58 - 8
44.9%z 3.47 - 9
44.9%z 3.46 - 10
44.8%z 3.46 - 11
44.8%z 3.46 - 12
44.2%z 3.42 - 13
44.1%z 3.41 - 14
43.5%z 3.37 - 15
43.3%z 3.36 - 16
42.8%z 3.33 - 17
41.4%z 3.24 - 18
41.3%z 3.24 - 19
41%z 3.21 - 20
40.8%z 3.20 - 21
40.7%z 3.19 - 22
40.7%z 3.19 - 23
40.6%z 3.19 - 24
40.5%z 3.18 - 25
40.3%z 3.17 - 26
40.3%z 3.17 - 27
40.1%z 3.16 - 28
40%z 3.15 - 29
39.9%z 3.14 - 30
39.9%z 3.14 - 31
39.1%z 3.09 - 32
39%z 3.08 - 33
38.5%z 3.05 - 34
38.5%z 3.05 - 35
38.3%z 3.04 - 36
38.3%z 3.04 - 37
38.1%z 3.03 - 38
37.8%z 3.00 - 39
37.7%z 3.00 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.6%z 2.99 - 42
37.6%z 2.99 - 43
37.6%z 2.99 - 44
37.5%z 2.98 - 45
37.3%z 2.97 - 46
37.1%z 2.96 - 47
36.9%z 2.95 - 48
36.8%z 2.94 - 49
36.8%z 2.94 - 50
36.7%z 2.94