Tom Chambers: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
67.2%z 3.88 - 2
47.8%z 3.66 - 3
46.5%z 3.57 - 4
44.3%z 3.43 - 5
44.2%z 3.42 - 6
43.8%z 3.39 - 7
43.5%z 3.37 - 8
42.9%z 3.34 - 9
42.5%z 3.31 - 10
42.4%z 3.31 - 11
42.3%z 3.30 - 12
42.2%z 3.29 - 13
41.9%z 3.27 - 14
41.2%z 3.22 - 15
40.9%z 3.21 - 16
40.8%z 3.20 - 17
40.5%z 3.18 - 18
40.3%z 3.17 - 19
40.1%z 3.16 - 20
39.9%z 3.14 - 21
39.7%z 3.13 - 22
39.5%z 3.11 - 23
39.4%z 3.11 - 24
39.3%z 3.10 - 25
39.2%z 3.09 - 26
39%z 3.08 - 27
38.9%z 3.08 - 28
38.8%z 3.07 - 29
38.7%z 3.07 - 30
38.6%z 3.06 - 31
38.5%z 3.05 - 32
38.4%z 3.05 - 33
38.3%z 3.04 - 34
38%z 3.02 - 35
37.9%z 3.01 - 36
37.4%z 2.98 - 37
37.4%z 2.98 - 38
37.3%z 2.98 - 39
37.2%z 2.97 - 40
37.2%z 2.97 - 41
37.1%z 2.96 - 42
37%z 2.95 - 43
36.8%z 2.94 - 44
36.7%z 2.94 - 45
36.6%z 2.93 - 46
36.6%z 2.93 - 47
36.6%z 2.93 - 48
36.6%z 2.93 - 49
36.6%z 2.93 - 50
36.4%z 2.91