Chantal Akerman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
88.8%z 4.74 - 2
81.8%z 4.17 - 3
80.9%z 4.09 - 4
80.4%z 4.05 - 5
80.3%z 4.04 - 6
61.4%z 3.81 - 7
61.4%z 3.81 - 8
60.5%z 3.80 - 9
60.2%z 3.80 - 10
58.4%z 3.78 - 11
58.2%z 3.78 - 12
56.8%z 3.76 - 13
54.4%z 3.74 - 14
54.1%z 3.73 - 15
52.3%z 3.71 - 16
48%z 3.66 - 17
47.9%z 3.66 - 18
47.7%z 3.65 - 19
47.5%z 3.64 - 20
47.2%z 3.61 - 21
47%z 3.60 - 22
46.5%z 3.57 - 23
46.5%z 3.57 - 24
46.5%z 3.57 - 25
46.4%z 3.56 - 26
46.2%z 3.55 - 27
45.7%z 3.52 - 28
45.7%z 3.52 - 29
44.7%z 3.45 - 30
44.6%z 3.45 - 31
44.3%z 3.43 - 32
44.3%z 3.43 - 33
44.3%z 3.43 - 34
44.2%z 3.42 - 35
44.2%z 3.42 - 36
44.1%z 3.42 - 37
44.1%z 3.42 - 38
44.1%z 3.41 - 39
43.7%z 3.39 - 40
43.5%z 3.37 - 41
43.4%z 3.37 - 42
43.2%z 3.36 - 43
43.1%z 3.35 - 44
43.1%z 3.35 - 45
42.8%z 3.33 - 46
42.8%z 3.33 - 47
42.8%z 3.33 - 48
42.4%z 3.31 - 49
42.3%z 3.30 - 50
42.2%z 3.29