Thomas Hölck: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.4%z 4.30 - 2
78.3%z 4.00 - 3
60.5%z 3.80 - 4
55.5%z 3.75 - 5
54.1%z 3.73 - 6
49.5%z 3.68 - 7
47.4%z 3.63 - 8
46.4%z 3.57 - 9
44.2%z 3.42 - 10
42.1%z 3.28 - 11
41.2%z 3.22 - 12
40.8%z 3.20 - 13
40.6%z 3.19 - 14
40.3%z 3.17 - 15
40%z 3.15 - 16
38.6%z 3.06 - 17
38.6%z 3.05 - 18
38.2%z 3.03 - 19
38%z 3.02 - 20
37.9%z 3.01 - 21
37.2%z 2.97 - 22
37.1%z 2.96 - 23
36.9%z 2.95 - 24
36.8%z 2.94 - 25
36.6%z 2.93 - 26
36.6%z 2.93 - 27
36.4%z 2.92 - 28
36.4%z 2.91 - 29
36.3%z 2.91 - 30
36.2%z 2.90 - 31
35.4%z 2.85 - 32
35.4%z 2.85 - 33
35.4%z 2.85 - 34
35.2%z 2.84 - 35
34.9%z 2.81 - 36
34.7%z 2.81 - 37
34.4%z 2.79 - 38
34.4%z 2.79 - 39
34.4%z 2.78 - 40
34.2%z 2.77 - 41
33.8%z 2.75 - 42
33.5%z 2.73 - 43
33.5%z 2.73 - 44
33.5%z 2.73 - 45
33.5%z 2.72 - 46
33.2%z 2.71 - 47
33.2%z 2.71 - 48
33.1%z 2.70 - 49
33%z 2.70 - 50
33%z 2.70