George Francomb: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.2%z 4.03 - 2
60.6%z 3.80 - 3
51.4%z 3.70 - 4
46.9%z 3.60 - 5
46.2%z 3.55 - 6
45.4%z 3.50 - 7
45%z 3.47 - 8
44.9%z 3.46 - 9
43.6%z 3.38 - 10
43.4%z 3.37 - 11
43.1%z 3.35 - 12
42.7%z 3.33 - 13
42.4%z 3.30 - 14
42.4%z 3.30 - 15
42.1%z 3.28 - 16
42%z 3.28 - 17
41.9%z 3.27 - 18
41.4%z 3.24 - 19
40.7%z 3.19 - 20
39.9%z 3.14 - 21
39.3%z 3.10 - 22
38.9%z 3.08 - 23
38.3%z 3.04 - 24
38.1%z 3.03 - 25
38.1%z 3.02 - 26
37.7%z 3.00 - 27
37.6%z 3.00 - 28
37.6%z 2.99 - 29
37.2%z 2.97 - 30
36.9%z 2.95 - 31
36.7%z 2.94 - 32
36.3%z 2.91 - 33
36.2%z 2.90 - 34
36.1%z 2.90 - 35
36.1%z 2.90 - 36
36.1%z 2.89 - 37
35.9%z 2.88 - 38
34.6%z 2.80 - 39
34.5%z 2.79 - 40
34.5%z 2.79 - 41
34.1%z 2.77 - 42
33.9%z 2.75 - 43
33.9%z 2.75 - 44
33.7%z 2.74 - 45
33.7%z 2.74 - 46
33.5%z 2.73 - 47
33.4%z 2.72 - 48
33.1%z 2.70 - 49
33.1%z 2.70 - 50
32.9%z 2.69