Philipp Ackermann: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.3%z 4.77 - 2
64.6%z 3.85 - 3
54.8%z 3.74 - 4
46.6%z 3.58 - 5
46.2%z 3.55 - 6
46.1%z 3.54 - 7
45.9%z 3.53 - 8
44.7%z 3.45 - 9
43.9%z 3.40 - 10
43.4%z 3.37 - 11
42.7%z 3.32 - 12
42.6%z 3.32 - 13
42.5%z 3.31 - 14
40.9%z 3.21 - 15
40.9%z 3.21 - 16
40.9%z 3.21 - 17
40.8%z 3.20 - 18
40.7%z 3.20 - 19
40.7%z 3.19 - 20
40.5%z 3.18 - 21
40.4%z 3.17 - 22
40.3%z 3.17 - 23
39.6%z 3.13 - 24
39.6%z 3.12 - 25
39.4%z 3.11 - 26
39.2%z 3.10 - 27
38.5%z 3.05 - 28
38.5%z 3.05 - 29
38.2%z 3.03 - 30
37.7%z 3.00 - 31
37.6%z 2.99 - 32
37.5%z 2.99 - 33
37.4%z 2.98 - 34
37.2%z 2.97 - 35
37.1%z 2.96 - 36
36.9%z 2.95 - 37
36.8%z 2.94 - 38
36.5%z 2.92 - 39
36.1%z 2.89 - 40
36%z 2.89 - 41
36%z 2.89 - 42
35.7%z 2.87 - 43
35%z 2.83 - 44
34.9%z 2.82 - 45
34.7%z 2.81 - 46
34.4%z 2.78 - 47
34.1%z 2.77 - 48
33.9%z 2.75 - 49
33.9%z 2.75 - 50
33.7%z 2.74