Jill Long Thompson: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
62.2%z 3.82 - 2
59.9%z 3.80 - 3
59.3%z 3.79 - 4
57.3%z 3.77 - 5
50.7%z 3.70 - 6
47.8%z 3.65 - 7
46.9%z 3.59 - 8
45.4%z 3.50 - 9
45.1%z 3.48 - 10
43.7%z 3.39 - 11
43.3%z 3.36 - 12
43%z 3.34 - 13
42.8%z 3.33 - 14
42.5%z 3.31 - 15
42.5%z 3.31 - 16
42.1%z 3.28 - 17
42%z 3.28 - 18
41.6%z 3.25 - 19
41.2%z 3.23 - 20
41.2%z 3.23 - 21
41.1%z 3.22 - 22
40.6%z 3.19 - 23
40.3%z 3.17 - 24
40.1%z 3.15 - 25
39.7%z 3.13 - 26
39.7%z 3.13 - 27
39.3%z 3.10 - 28
39.2%z 3.10 - 29
38.9%z 3.08 - 30
38.8%z 3.07 - 31
38.5%z 3.05 - 32
38.5%z 3.05 - 33
38.4%z 3.05 - 34
38.4%z 3.05 - 35
38.4%z 3.04 - 36
38.3%z 3.04 - 37
38.1%z 3.03 - 38
38.1%z 3.03 - 39
38.1%z 3.03 - 40
38%z 3.02 - 41
37.9%z 3.01 - 42
37.8%z 3.01 - 43
37.6%z 2.99 - 44
37.5%z 2.99 - 45
37.5%z 2.99 - 46
37.5%z 2.98 - 47
37.4%z 2.98 - 48
37.3%z 2.97 - 49
36.8%z 2.94 - 50
36.7%z 2.93