David Toms: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.1%z 4.85 - 2
85.5%z 4.46 - 3
82%z 4.18 - 4
75.6%z 3.97 - 5
69.2%z 3.90 - 6
62.7%z 3.83 - 7
55.7%z 3.75 - 8
53.2%z 3.72 - 9
47.7%z 3.65 - 10
47.4%z 3.63 - 11
46%z 3.54 - 12
45.3%z 3.49 - 13
45.1%z 3.48 - 14
44.9%z 3.46 - 15
44.8%z 3.46 - 16
44.7%z 3.45 - 17
44.1%z 3.41 - 18
44%z 3.41 - 19
43.1%z 3.35 - 20
42.5%z 3.31 - 21
42.1%z 3.28 - 22
42%z 3.28 - 23
41.8%z 3.26 - 24
41.3%z 3.23 - 25
41.3%z 3.23 - 26
40.7%z 3.19 - 27
40.7%z 3.19 - 28
40.2%z 3.16 - 29
40.2%z 3.16 - 30
39.3%z 3.10 - 31
39.2%z 3.10 - 32
39.2%z 3.09 - 33
39.1%z 3.09 - 34
38.5%z 3.05 - 35
38.5%z 3.05 - 36
37.9%z 3.01 - 37
37.8%z 3.01 - 38
37.8%z 3.01 - 39
37.8%z 3.00 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.4%z 2.98 - 42
37.2%z 2.97 - 43
37.2%z 2.97 - 44
37.1%z 2.96 - 45
36.9%z 2.95 - 46
36.9%z 2.94 - 47
36.8%z 2.94 - 48
36.7%z 2.94 - 49
36.7%z 2.93