Thomas Hoeren: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
95.7%z 5.90 - 2
78.7%z 4.00 - 3
59.7%z 3.80 - 4
55.3%z 3.75 - 5
47.5%z 3.63 - 6
47.4%z 3.63 - 7
47.2%z 3.61 - 8
46.4%z 3.57 - 9
46.1%z 3.54 - 10
44.9%z 3.47 - 11
44.7%z 3.45 - 12
44.6%z 3.45 - 13
44.1%z 3.41 - 14
43.8%z 3.40 - 15
43.3%z 3.36 - 16
42.9%z 3.33 - 17
42.3%z 3.30 - 18
42.3%z 3.30 - 19
42%z 3.28 - 20
41.8%z 3.27 - 21
41.6%z 3.25 - 22
41.3%z 3.23 - 23
41.3%z 3.23 - 24
41.1%z 3.22 - 25
40.1%z 3.16 - 26
39.5%z 3.12 - 27
39.4%z 3.11 - 28
39.4%z 3.11 - 29
38.8%z 3.07 - 30
38.7%z 3.06 - 31
38.5%z 3.05 - 32
38.2%z 3.03 - 33
38.1%z 3.03 - 34
38.1%z 3.02 - 35
38%z 3.02 - 36
37.8%z 3.00 - 37
37.6%z 2.99 - 38
37.3%z 2.98 - 39
37.3%z 2.97 - 40
37.2%z 2.96 - 41
37.1%z 2.96 - 42
37%z 2.95 - 43
36.9%z 2.95 - 44
36.8%z 2.94 - 45
36.8%z 2.94 - 46
36.7%z 2.93 - 47
36.3%z 2.91 - 48
36.1%z 2.90 - 49
36%z 2.89 - 50
36%z 2.89