Tim Aker: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
56%z 3.75 - 2
50.1%z 3.69 - 3
46.9%z 3.60 - 4
46.7%z 3.59 - 5
44.8%z 3.46 - 6
44.8%z 3.46 - 7
44%z 3.41 - 8
43.9%z 3.40 - 9
43.8%z 3.40 - 10
43.1%z 3.35 - 11
43%z 3.34 - 12
42.4%z 3.30 - 13
42.3%z 3.30 - 14
41.6%z 3.25 - 15
41.4%z 3.24 - 16
41.4%z 3.24 - 17
40.5%z 3.18 - 18
40.3%z 3.17 - 19
40.2%z 3.16 - 20
39.7%z 3.13 - 21
39.5%z 3.11 - 22
39.4%z 3.11 - 23
39.2%z 3.10 - 24
38.9%z 3.08 - 25
38.8%z 3.07 - 26
38.8%z 3.07 - 27
38.8%z 3.07 - 28
38.7%z 3.06 - 29
38.6%z 3.06 - 30
38%z 3.02 - 31
38%z 3.02 - 32
37.9%z 3.01 - 33
37.7%z 3.00 - 34
37.4%z 2.98 - 35
37.3%z 2.98 - 36
37.1%z 2.96 - 37
37%z 2.95 - 38
37%z 2.95 - 39
36.8%z 2.94 - 40
36.7%z 2.93 - 41
36.6%z 2.93 - 42
36.6%z 2.93 - 43
36.5%z 2.92 - 44
36.5%z 2.92 - 45
36.5%z 2.92 - 46
36.4%z 2.92 - 47
36.4%z 2.91 - 48
36.3%z 2.91 - 49
36.3%z 2.91 - 50
35.9%z 2.88