Amber Tang: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.1%z 4.18 - 2
81.3%z 4.12 - 3
81.1%z 4.11 - 4
80%z 4.02 - 5
77.8%z 3.99 - 6
71.2%z 3.92 - 7
69%z 3.90 - 8
68.9%z 3.90 - 9
66.9%z 3.87 - 10
56.3%z 3.76 - 11
53.7%z 3.73 - 12
47.6%z 3.64 - 13
46.9%z 3.59 - 14
46.6%z 3.58 - 15
46.5%z 3.57 - 16
45.8%z 3.52 - 17
45.4%z 3.50 - 18
45.4%z 3.50 - 19
45.3%z 3.49 - 20
45.2%z 3.48 - 21
44.9%z 3.46 - 22
44.8%z 3.46 - 23
44.8%z 3.46 - 24
44.3%z 3.43 - 25
44.1%z 3.41 - 26
44%z 3.41 - 27
43.9%z 3.40 - 28
43.8%z 3.40 - 29
43.5%z 3.38 - 30
43.5%z 3.37 - 31
43.3%z 3.36 - 32
43%z 3.34 - 33
42.8%z 3.33 - 34
41.5%z 3.24 - 35
41.3%z 3.23 - 36
40.7%z 3.20 - 37
40.6%z 3.18 - 38
40.4%z 3.17 - 39
40.3%z 3.17 - 40
40.3%z 3.17 - 41
40.3%z 3.17 - 42
40.3%z 3.17 - 43
40.2%z 3.16 - 44
40.2%z 3.16 - 45
40.2%z 3.16 - 46
40.2%z 3.16 - 47
40%z 3.15 - 48
39.9%z 3.14 - 49
39.5%z 3.12 - 50
39.5%z 3.11